GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Savitt vs Anisimova

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
SavittWinner
81.1

Savitt wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Anisimova
81.1

Anisimova wins: Longevity, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/dick-savitt-vs-amanda-anisimova

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Dick Savitt
81.1

Savitt leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Won the Australian and Wimbledon titles in the same 1951 season.

1. Dick Savitt
81.1
2. Amanda Anisimova
81.1

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇺🇸 Dick Savitt5 seasons played · career day 1,825371 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Amanda Anisimova5 seasons played · career day 2,190269 titles
-27.5% vs Savitt at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Savitt0040109371586
🇺🇸 Anisimova00095224499

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricSavittRetiredAnisimovaActive
Major singles titles2
Major titles in one year2
Davis Cup wins5
Wimbledon titles1
Australian Championships1
Grand Slam finals2
WTA singles titles4
Career high ranking4
Grand Slam semi-finals3
WTA 1000 titles1
Dominance w25%8078
Peak w20%9492
Longevity w20%7072
Honours w20%8078
Statistics w15%8288

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Savitt81.1
Anisimova81.1
The people
Savitt
Anisimova

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Savitt vs Anisimova. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →