GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Safina vs Krejčíková

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
SafinaWinner
79.6

Safina wins: Peak

Krejčíková
79.6

Krejčíková wins: Honours

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/dinara-safina-vs-barbora-krejcikova

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇷🇺 Dinara Safina
79.6

Safina leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. World No. 1 in 2009 with three Grand Slam finals and Olympic silver.

1. Dinara Safina
79.6
2. Barbora Krejčíková
79.6

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇨🇿 Barbora Krejčíková5 seasons played · career day 2,92116 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇷🇺 Dinara Safina5 seasons played · career day 2,5567 titles
-56.2% vs Krejčíková at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇷🇺 Safina0000314
🇨🇿 Krejčíková0000321

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricSafinaRetiredKrejčíkováActive
Weeks at No. 126
WTA titles12
Grand Slam finals3
Olympic medals1
Fed Cup titles2
Grand Slam singles titles2
Grand Slam doubles titles7
Olympic golds1
WTA singles titles9
Career-high ranking2
Dominance w25%7676
Peak w20%9086
Longevity w20%7272
Honours w20%7882
Statistics w15%8484

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Safina79.6
Krejčíková79.6
The people
Safina
Krejčíková

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Safina vs Krejčíková. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →