Who is better, Safina or Keys?
Dinara Safina leads with a GOAT score of 79.6 against 79.6 for Madison Keys — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Safina vs Keys
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Dinara Safina and Madison Keys level at 79.6. Dinara Safina leads on Peak, Dominance, Honours. Madison Keys leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
SafinaWinner
79.6Safina wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Keys
79.6Keys wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to TennisShareable URL · /compare/dinara-safina-vs-madison-keys
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇷🇺 Dinara Safina
79.6
Safina leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Dinara Safina
2. Madison Keys
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Madison Keys5 seasons played · career day 3,28613 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇷🇺 Dinara Safina5 seasons played · career day 2,5567 titles
-46.2% vs Keys at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇷🇺 Safina | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 14 |
| 🇺🇸 Keys | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 13 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Safina79.6
Keys79.6
FAQ
Where does Keys beat Safina?
Keys scores higher on longevity. Safina leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
How is the Safina vs Keys score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Safina: 79.6, Keys: 79.6.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Safina vs Keys. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.