Who is better, Meneghin or Malone?
Dino Meneghin leads with a GOAT score of 88.7 against 88.5 for Moses Malone — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Dino Meneghin above Moses Malone: 88.7 vs 88.5. Dino Meneghin leads on Longevity, Honours. Moses Malone leads on Statistics, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Meneghin wins: Longevity, Honours
Malone wins: Dominance, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/dino-meneghin-vs-moses-malone
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Meneghin leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇹 Meneghin | 0 | 0 | 50 | 104 | 288 | 586 |
| 🇺🇸 Malone | 0 | 0 | 18.8 | 32.8 | 90.2 | 196.1 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MeneghinRetired | MaloneRetired |
|---|---|---|
| EuroLeague titles | 7 | — |
| Italian league titles | 12 | — |
| European Championship golds | 1 | — |
| Olympic medals | 1 | — |
| Seasons played | 28 | — |
| MVP awards | — | 3 |
| NBA titles | — | 1 |
| Finals MVP | — | 1 |
| All-Star selections | — | 13 |
| Career points | — | 29,580 |
| Offensive rebounds | — | 7,382 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 94 | 90 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 92 |
Dino Meneghin leads with a GOAT score of 88.7 against 88.5 for Moses Malone — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Malone scores higher on dominance, statistics. Meneghin leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Meneghin: 88.7, Malone: 88.5.
Make your case for Meneghin vs Malone. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.