Who is better, Dirk or Hortência?
Dirk Nowitzki leads with a GOAT score of 88.1 against 88.1 for Hortência Marcari — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Dirk Nowitzki and Hortência Marcari level at 88.1. Dirk Nowitzki leads on Longevity. Hortência Marcari leads on Peak, Statistics, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Dirk wins: Longevity
Hortência wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/dirk-vs-hortencia-marcari
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Dirk leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇪 Dirk | 0 | 0 | 8.2 | 25.7 | 96 | 195.1 |
| 🇧🇷 Hortência | 0 | 0 | 50 | 104 | 226 | 604 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | DirkRetired | HortênciaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| NBA titles | 1 | — |
| MVP awards | 1 | — |
| Finals MVP | 1 | — |
| All-Star selections | 14 | — |
| Career points | 31,560 | — |
| EuroBasket MVP | 1 | — |
| World Championship titles | — | 1 |
| Olympic silver medals | — | 1 |
| World Championship points per game | — | 23 |
| South American titles | — | 8 |
| Career national team points | — | 3,000 |
| Dominance w25% | 85 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 94 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 92 |
Dirk Nowitzki leads with a GOAT score of 88.1 against 88.1 for Hortência Marcari — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Hortência scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Dirk leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Dirk: 88.1, Hortência: 88.1.
Make your case for Dirk vs Hortência. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.