Who is better, Dirk or Archibald?
Nate Archibald leads with a GOAT score of 88.2 against 88.1 for Dirk Nowitzki — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Nate Archibald above Dirk Nowitzki: 88.2 vs 88.1. Nate Archibald leads on Peak, Statistics, Dominance. Dirk Nowitzki leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Archibald wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Dirk wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/dirk-vs-nate-archibald
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Archibald leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇪 Dirk | 0 | 0 | 8.2 | 25.7 | 96 | 195.1 |
| 🇺🇸 Archibald | 0 | 0 | 55 | 132 | 413 | 713 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | DirkRetired | ArchibaldRetired |
|---|---|---|
| NBA titles | 1 | — |
| MVP awards | 1 | — |
| Finals MVP | 1 | — |
| All-Star selections | 14 | 6 |
| Career points | 31,560 | — |
| EuroBasket MVP | 1 | — |
| Scoring and assist titles in one season | — | 1 |
| NBA championships | — | 1 |
| Career assists | — | 6,476 |
| Points per game in 1973 | — | 34 |
| Dominance w25% | 85 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 98 |
| Longevity w20% | 94 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 92 |
Nate Archibald leads with a GOAT score of 88.2 against 88.1 for Dirk Nowitzki — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Dirk scores higher on honours, longevity. Archibald leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Dirk: 88.1, Archibald: 88.2.
Make your case for Dirk vs Archibald. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.