Who is better, Bergknecht or Gross?
Michael Gross leads with a GOAT score of 90.3 against 21.4 for Nadja Bergknecht — a gap of 68.9 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Michael Gross above Nadja Bergknecht: 90.3 vs 21.4. Michael Gross leads on Statistics, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Gross wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Bergknecht wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/disc-nadja-bergknecht-vs-michael-gross
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Gross leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Bergknecht — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇪 Bergknecht | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 🇩🇪 Gross | 0 | 0 | 6 | 9 | 12 | 22 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BergknechtRetired | GrossRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | — | 3 |
| Olympic medals | — | 6 |
| World Championship titles | — | 5 |
| European titles | — | 13 |
| World records set | — | 12 |
| Dominance w25% | 21.3 | 90 |
| Peak w20% | 23.3 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 19.3 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 22.3 | 92 |
| Statistics w15% | 20.3 | 92 |
Michael Gross leads with a GOAT score of 90.3 against 21.4 for Nadja Bergknecht — a gap of 68.9 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Bergknecht does not lead any of the five categories; Gross is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bergknecht: 21.4, Gross: 90.3.
Make your case for Bergknecht vs Gross. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.