Who is better, Djokovic or Budge?
Novak Djokovic leads with a GOAT score of 97.6 against 90.9 for Don Budge — a gap of 6.7 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Novak Djokovic above Don Budge: 97.6 vs 90.9. Novak Djokovic leads on Longevity, Honours, Dominance. Don Budge leads on Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Djokovic wins: Dominance, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Budge wins: Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/djokovic-vs-don-budge
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Djokovic leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Budge — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | DjokovicActive | BudgeRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam titles | 24 | — |
| Weeks at No. 1 | 428 | — |
| Masters 1000 titles | 40 | — |
| Career titles | 99 | — |
| Match win % | 83.2% | — |
| Year-end No. 1 finishes | 8 | — |
| Olympic gold | 1 | — |
| Calendar Grand Slams | — | 1 |
| Major singles titles | — | 6 |
| Major titles including doubles | — | 14 |
| Davis Cup titles | — | 2 |
| Consecutive major wins | — | 6 |
| Dominance w25% | 99 | 94 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 98 |
| Longevity w20% | 97 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 99 | 92 |
| Statistics w15% | 96 | 92 |
Novak Djokovic leads with a GOAT score of 97.6 against 90.9 for Don Budge — a gap of 6.7 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Budge scores higher on peak. Djokovic leads on dominance, honours, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Djokovic: 97.6, Budge: 90.9.
Make your case for Djokovic vs Budge. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.