Who is better, Djokovic or Brookes?
Novak Djokovic leads with a GOAT score of 97.6 against 82.1 for Norman Brookes — a gap of 15.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Novak Djokovic above Norman Brookes: 97.6 vs 82.1. Novak Djokovic leads on Longevity, Dominance, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Djokovic wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Brookes wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/djokovic-vs-norman-brookes
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Djokovic leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Brookes — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | DjokovicActive | BrookesRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam titles | 24 | — |
| Weeks at No. 1 | 428 | — |
| Masters 1000 titles | 40 | — |
| Career titles | 99 | — |
| Match win % | 83.2% | — |
| Year-end No. 1 finishes | 8 | — |
| Olympic gold | 1 | — |
| Major singles titles | — | 3 |
| Wimbledon titles | — | 2 |
| Australasian titles | — | 1 |
| Davis Cup titles | — | 4 |
| Major finals | — | 5 |
| Dominance w25% | 99 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 97 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 99 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 96 | 80 |
Novak Djokovic leads with a GOAT score of 97.6 against 82.1 for Norman Brookes — a gap of 15.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Brookes does not lead any of the five categories; Djokovic is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Djokovic: 97.6, Brookes: 82.1.
Make your case for Djokovic vs Brookes. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.