Who is better, Djokovic or Muster?
Novak Djokovic leads with a GOAT score of 97.6 against 83.1 for Thomas Muster — a gap of 14.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Novak Djokovic above Thomas Muster: 97.6 vs 83.1. Novak Djokovic leads on Longevity, Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Djokovic wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Muster wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/djokovic-vs-thomas-muster
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Djokovic leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Muster — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | DjokovicActive | MusterRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam titles | 24 | — |
| Weeks at No. 1 | 428 | — |
| Masters 1000 titles | 40 | — |
| Career titles | 99 | — |
| Match win % | 83.2% | — |
| Year-end No. 1 finishes | 8 | — |
| Olympic gold | 1 | — |
| Major singles titles | — | 1 |
| Career singles titles | — | 44 |
| Clay-court titles | — | 40 |
| Weeks at world number one | — | 6 |
| Consecutive clay wins in 1995 | — | 40 |
| Dominance w25% | 99 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 97 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 99 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 96 | 84 |
Novak Djokovic leads with a GOAT score of 97.6 against 83.1 for Thomas Muster — a gap of 14.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Muster does not lead any of the five categories; Djokovic is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Djokovic: 97.6, Muster: 83.1.
Make your case for Djokovic vs Muster. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.