GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Cork vs Bakewell

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
BakewellWinner
81.9

Bakewell wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics

Cork
81.8

Cork wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/dominic-cork-vs-fred-bakewell

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Fred Bakewell
81.9

Bakewell leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Scored 107 in the 1933 Oval Test before a car crash ended his career.

1. Fred Bakewell
81.9
2. Dominic Cork
81.8

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇬🇧 Fred Bakewell5 years played · career day 1,826340 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Dominic Cork5 years played · career day 1,825325 runs
-4.4% vs Bakewell at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇬🇧 Cork0045100325683
🇬🇧 Bakewell0050109254610

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricCorkRetiredBakewellRetired
Test wickets131
Test hat-tricks1
Best innings figures on debut7
First-class wickets989
Tests played37
Test runs409
Test centuries1
First-class runs14,570
First-class centuries31
Highest score257
Dominance w25%7680
Peak w20%9092
Longevity w20%8474
Honours w20%7476
Statistics w15%8890

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Bakewell81.9
Cork81.8
The people
Cork
Bakewell

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Cork vs Bakewell. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →