Who is better, Thiem or Schiavone?
Dominic Thiem leads with a GOAT score of 81.0 against 80.8 for Francesca Schiavone — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Dominic Thiem above Francesca Schiavone: 81.0 vs 80.8. Dominic Thiem leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Francesca Schiavone leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Thiem wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Schiavone wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/dominic-thiem-vs-francesca-schiavone
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Thiem leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇹 Thiem | 0 | 0 | 50 | 105 | 300 | 634 |
| 🇮🇹 Schiavone | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 10 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ThiemRetired | SchiavoneRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Major singles titles | 1 | — |
| Major finals | 4 | — |
| Career singles titles | 17 | — |
| Career-high world ranking | 3 | — |
| Tour Finals appearances | 5 | — |
| Grand Slam singles titles | — | 1 |
| WTA titles | — | 8 |
| Fed Cup titles | — | 4 |
| Career-high ranking | — | 4 |
| Career match wins | — | 528 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 72 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 90 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 80 |
Dominic Thiem leads with a GOAT score of 81.0 against 80.8 for Francesca Schiavone — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Schiavone scores higher on longevity. Thiem leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Thiem: 81.0, Schiavone: 80.8.
Make your case for Thiem vs Schiavone. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.