Who is better, Hašek or Lidström?
Dominik Hašek leads with a GOAT score of 89.1 against 89.1 for Nicklas Lidström — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Dominik Hašek and Nicklas Lidström level at 89.1. Dominik Hašek leads on Peak, Statistics, Dominance. Nicklas Lidström leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Hašek wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Lidström wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/dominik-hasek-vs-lidstrom
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Hašek leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇿 Hašek | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 🇸🇪 Lidström | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 307 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | HašekRetired | LidströmRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Vezina Trophies | 6 | — |
| Hart Trophies | 2 | — |
| Stanley Cups | 2 | 4 |
| Olympic golds | 1 | 1 |
| Career shutouts | 81 | — |
| Career save percentage | 0.922 | — |
| Norris Trophies | — | 7 |
| Conn Smythe Trophies | — | 1 |
| NHL points | — | 1,142 |
| All-Star selections | — | 12 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 87 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 94 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 86 |
Dominik Hašek leads with a GOAT score of 89.1 against 89.1 for Nicklas Lidström — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Lidström scores higher on honours, longevity. Hašek leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Hašek: 89.1, Lidström: 89.1.
Make your case for Hašek vs Lidström. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.