Who is better, Bradman or Goswami?
Don Bradman leads with a GOAT score of 96.8 against 85.6 for Jhulan Goswami — a gap of 11.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Don Bradman above Jhulan Goswami: 96.8 vs 85.6. Don Bradman leads on Dominance, Honours, Peak. Jhulan Goswami leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Bradman wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Goswami wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/don-bradman-vs-jhulan-goswami
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Bradman leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Bradman | 0 | 0 | 0 | 66 | 395 | 803 |
| 🇮🇳 Goswami | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 65 | 141 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BradmanRetired | GoswamiRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Test batting average | 99.94 | — |
| Test centuries | 29 | — |
| Test runs | 6,996 | — |
| Test double centuries | 12 | — |
| Ashes series won as captain | 4 | — |
| ODI wickets | — | 255 |
| International wickets | — | 353 |
| ODI average | — | 22 |
| World Cup finals | — | 2 |
| ICC Player of the Year | — | 1 |
| Years at international level | — | 20 |
| Dominance w25% | 100 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 100 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 96 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 100 | 90 |
Don Bradman leads with a GOAT score of 96.8 against 85.6 for Jhulan Goswami — a gap of 11.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Goswami scores higher on longevity. Bradman leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bradman: 96.8, Goswami: 85.6.
Make your case for Bradman vs Goswami. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.