Who is better, Bradman or Sciver-Brunt?
Don Bradman leads with a GOAT score of 96.8 against 90.4 for Katherine Sciver-Brunt — a gap of 6.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Bradman vs Sciver-Brunt
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Don Bradman above Katherine Sciver-Brunt: 96.8 vs 90.4. Don Bradman leads on Dominance, Honours, Peak. Katherine Sciver-Brunt leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
BradmanWinner
96.8Bradman wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Sciver-Brunt
90.4Sciver-Brunt wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/don-bradman-vs-katherine-sciver-brunt
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇦🇺 Don Bradman
96.8
Bradman leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Don Bradman
2. Katherine Sciver-Brunt
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇦🇺 Don Bradman5 years played · career day 2,191505 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Katherine Sciver-Brunt5 years played · career day 1,82690 runs
-82.2% vs Bradman at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Bradman | 0 | 0 | 0 | 66 | 395 | 803 |
| 🇬🇧 Sciver-Brunt | 0 | 0 | 10 | 24 | 64 | 222 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BradmanRetired | Sciver-BruntRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Test batting average | 99.94 | — |
| Test centuries | 29 | — |
| Test runs | 6,996 | — |
| Test double centuries | 12 | — |
| Ashes series won as captain | 4 | — |
| World Cup titles | — | 2 |
| T20 World Cup titles | — | 1 |
| ODI wickets | — | 170 |
| T20I wickets | — | 114 |
| Test wickets | — | 51 |
| Dominance w25% | 100 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 100 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 96 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 100 | 94 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Bradman96.8
Sciver-Brunt90.4
FAQ
Where does Sciver-Brunt beat Bradman?
Sciver-Brunt scores higher on longevity. Bradman leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
How is the Bradman vs Sciver-Brunt score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bradman: 96.8, Sciver-Brunt: 90.4.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Bradman vs Sciver-Brunt. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.