Who is better, Bradman or Barnett?
Don Bradman leads with a GOAT score of 96.8 against 80.6 for Kim Barnett — a gap of 16.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Bradman vs Barnett
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Don Bradman above Kim Barnett: 96.8 vs 80.6. Don Bradman leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak. Kim Barnett leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
BradmanWinner
96.8Bradman wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Barnett
80.6Barnett wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/don-bradman-vs-kim-barnett
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇦🇺 Don Bradman
96.8
Bradman leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Don Bradman
2. Kim Barnett
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🏴 Kim Barnett5 years played · career day 2,1916,200 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇦🇺 Don Bradman5 years played · career day 2,191505 runs
-91.9% vs Barnett at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Bradman | 0 | 0 | 0 | 66 | 395 | 803 |
| 🏴 Barnett | 0 | 0 | 0 | 900 | 4,700 | 10,750 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BradmanRetired | BarnettRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Test batting average | 99.94 | — |
| Test centuries | 29 | — |
| Test runs | 6,996 | — |
| Test double centuries | 12 | — |
| Ashes series won as captain | 4 | — |
| First-class runs | — | 28,593 |
| First-class centuries | — | 61 |
| Tests played | — | 4 |
| Seasons played | — | 26 |
| List A runs | — | 12,016 |
| Dominance w25% | 100 | 72 |
| Peak w20% | 100 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 94 |
| Honours w20% | 96 | 66 |
| Statistics w15% | 100 | 92 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Bradman96.8
Barnett80.6
FAQ
Where does Barnett beat Bradman?
Barnett scores higher on longevity. Bradman leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
How is the Bradman vs Barnett score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bradman: 96.8, Barnett: 80.6.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Bradman vs Barnett. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.