Who is better, Bradman or Booth?
Don Bradman leads with a GOAT score of 96.8 against 79.5 for Major Booth — a gap of 17.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Don Bradman above Major Booth: 96.8 vs 79.5. Don Bradman leads on Dominance, Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Bradman wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Booth wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/don-bradman-vs-major-booth
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Bradman leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Bradman | 0 | 0 | 0 | 66 | 395 | 803 |
| 🇬🇧 Booth | 0 | 0 | 50 | 109 | 252 | 479 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BradmanRetired | BoothRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Test batting average | 99.94 | — |
| Test centuries | 29 | — |
| Test runs | 6,996 | — |
| Test double centuries | 12 | — |
| Ashes series won as captain | 4 | — |
| Test appearances | — | 2 |
| First-class wickets | — | 603 |
| First-class runs | — | 4,753 |
| Wisden Cricketer of the Year | — | 1 |
| Seasons with 100 wickets | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 100 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 100 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 66 |
| Honours w20% | 96 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 100 | 88 |
Don Bradman leads with a GOAT score of 96.8 against 79.5 for Major Booth — a gap of 17.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Booth does not lead any of the five categories; Bradman is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bradman: 96.8, Booth: 79.5.
Make your case for Bradman vs Booth. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.