Who is better, Bradman or Naseem?
Don Bradman leads with a GOAT score of 96.8 against 73.2 for Naseem Shah — a gap of 23.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Don Bradman above Naseem Shah: 96.8 vs 73.2. Don Bradman leads on Dominance, Honours, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Bradman wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Naseem wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/don-bradman-vs-naseem-shah
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Bradman leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Bradman | 0 | 0 | 0 | 66 | 395 | 803 |
| 🇵🇰 Naseem | 0 | 0 | 13 | 21 | 75 | 109 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BradmanRetired | NaseemActive |
|---|---|---|
| Test batting average | 99.94 | — |
| Test centuries | 29 | — |
| Test runs | 6,996 | — |
| Test double centuries | 12 | — |
| Ashes series won as captain | 4 | — |
| Test wickets | — | 57 |
| Youngest Test hat-trick age | — | 16 |
| ODI wickets | — | 39 |
| Asia Cup titles | — | 1 |
| International career years | — | 7 |
| Dominance w25% | 100 | 70 |
| Peak w20% | 100 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 62 |
| Honours w20% | 96 | 66 |
| Statistics w15% | 100 | 86 |
Don Bradman leads with a GOAT score of 96.8 against 73.2 for Naseem Shah — a gap of 23.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Naseem does not lead any of the five categories; Bradman is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bradman: 96.8, Naseem: 73.2.
Make your case for Bradman vs Naseem. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.