Who is better, Bradman or Cox?
Don Bradman leads with a GOAT score of 96.8 against 15.5 for Jordan Cox — a gap of 81.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Bradman wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Cox wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/don-bradman-vs-ros-jordan-cox
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Bradman leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Cox — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Bradman | 0 | 0 | 0 | 66 | 395 | 803 |
| 🏳️ Cox | 0 | 0 | 145 | 216 | 216 | 216 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BradmanRetired | CoxActive · Royal Challengers Bengaluru |
|---|---|---|
| Test batting average | 99.94 | — |
| Test centuries | 29 | — |
| Test runs | 6,996 | — |
| Test double centuries | 12 | — |
| Ashes series won as captain | 4 | — |
| Matches (T20 leagues + internationals) | — | 15 |
| Runs | — | 216 |
| Wickets | — | 0 |
| Number | — | 22 |
| Dominance w25% | 100 | 15.3 |
| Peak w20% | 100 | 20.5 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 13.3 |
| Honours w20% | 96 | 11.3 |
| Statistics w15% | 100 | 17.5 |
Don Bradman leads with a GOAT score of 96.8 against 15.5 for Jordan Cox — a gap of 81.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Cox does not lead any of the five categories; Bradman is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bradman: 96.8, Cox: 15.5.
Make your case for Bradman vs Cox. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.