Who is better, Bradman or Stirling?
Don Bradman leads with a GOAT score of 96.8 against 67.2 for Paul Stirling — a gap of 29.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Don Bradman above Paul Stirling: 96.8 vs 67.2. Don Bradman leads on Peak, Dominance, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Bradman wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Stirling wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/don-bradman-vs-ros-paul-stirling
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Bradman leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Bradman | 0 | 0 | 0 | 66 | 395 | 803 |
| 🏳️ Stirling | 0 | 0 | 4 | 51 | 414 | 1,559 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BradmanRetired | StirlingActive · Guyana Amazon Warriors |
|---|---|---|
| Test batting average | 99.94 | — |
| Test centuries | 29 | — |
| Test runs | 6,996 | — |
| Test double centuries | 12 | — |
| Ashes series won as captain | 4 | — |
| Matches (T20 leagues + internationals) | — | 266 |
| Runs | — | 7,307 |
| Wickets | — | 38 |
| Player of the match | — | 16 |
| Dominance w25% | 100 | 64.6 |
| Peak w20% | 100 | 59.2 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 75 |
| Honours w20% | 96 | 70 |
| Statistics w15% | 100 | 68.3 |
Don Bradman leads with a GOAT score of 96.8 against 67.2 for Paul Stirling — a gap of 29.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Stirling does not lead any of the five categories; Bradman is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bradman: 96.8, Stirling: 67.2.
Make your case for Bradman vs Stirling. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.