Who is better, Coryell or Baugh?
Sammy Baugh leads with a GOAT score of 92.3 against 87.3 for Don Coryell — a gap of 5.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Sammy Baugh above Don Coryell: 92.3 vs 87.3. Sammy Baugh leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Baugh wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Coryell wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/don-coryell-vs-sammy-baugh
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Baugh leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Coryell — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Coryell | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 🇺🇸 Baugh | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 330 | 695 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | CoryellRetired | BaughRetired |
|---|---|---|
| NFL coaching wins | 111 | — |
| Division titles | 5 | — |
| Playoff appearances | 6 | — |
| Seasons as NFL head coach | 14 | — |
| Hall of Fame inductions | 1 | — |
| NFL titles | — | 2 |
| Passing titles | — | 6 |
| Punting average | — | 45 |
| Career interceptions on defence | — | 31 |
| Seasons played | — | 16 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 92 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 96 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 92 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 94 |
Sammy Baugh leads with a GOAT score of 92.3 against 87.3 for Don Coryell — a gap of 5.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Coryell does not lead any of the five categories; Baugh is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Coryell: 87.3, Baugh: 92.3.
Make your case for Coryell vs Baugh. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.