Who is better, Haskins or Kareem?
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar leads with a GOAT score of 95.2 against 87.3 for Don Haskins — a gap of 7.9 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Kareem Abdul-Jabbar above Don Haskins: 95.2 vs 87.3. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar leads on Dominance, Honours, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Kareem wins: Dominance, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Haskins wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/don-haskins-vs-kareem
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Kareem leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Haskins — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Haskins | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 90 | 168 |
| 🇺🇸 Kareem | 0 | 0 | 28.8 | 60.5 | 152.5 | 262.6 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | HaskinsRetired | KareemRetired |
|---|---|---|
| NCAA championships | 1 | — |
| College coaching wins | 719 | — |
| NCAA tournament appearances | 14 | — |
| Conference titles | 7 | — |
| Seasons at UTEP | 38 | — |
| NBA titles | — | 6 |
| MVP awards | — | 6 |
| All-Star selections | — | 19 |
| Career points | — | 38,387 |
| Finals MVP | — | 2 |
| Career rebounds | — | 17,440 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 95 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 92 | 96 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 95 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 96 |
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar leads with a GOAT score of 95.2 against 87.3 for Don Haskins — a gap of 7.9 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Haskins does not lead any of the five categories; Kareem is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Haskins: 87.3, Kareem: 95.2.
Make your case for Haskins vs Kareem. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.