Who is better, McNeill or Chang?
Don McNeill leads with a GOAT score of 85.0 against 84.7 for Michael Chang — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
McNeill vs Chang
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Don McNeill above Michael Chang: 85.0 vs 84.7. Don McNeill leads on Dominance, Honours. Michael Chang leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
McNeillWinner
85.0McNeill wins: Dominance, Honours
Chang
84.7Chang wins: Longevity, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to TennisShareable URL · /compare/don-mcneill-vs-michael-chang
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Don McNeill
85.0
McNeill leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Don McNeill
2. Michael Chang
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Don McNeill5 seasons played · career day 1,826378 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Michael Chang5 seasons played · career day 1,82611 titles
-97.1% vs McNeill at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 McNeill | 0 | 0 | 55 | 120 | 282 | 706 |
| 🇺🇸 Chang | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 25 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
McNeill85.0
Chang84.7
FAQ
Where does Chang beat McNeill?
Chang scores higher on statistics, longevity. McNeill leads on dominance, honours.
How is the McNeill vs Chang score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. McNeill: 85.0, Chang: 84.7.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for McNeill vs Chang. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.