Who is better, Shula or Baugh?
Don Shula leads with a GOAT score of 93.9 against 92.3 for Sammy Baugh — a gap of 1.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Don Shula above Sammy Baugh: 93.9 vs 92.3. Don Shula leads on Longevity, Dominance, Honours. Sammy Baugh leads on Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Shula wins: Dominance, Longevity, Honours
Baugh wins: Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/don-shula-vs-sammy-baugh
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Baugh leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Shula — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Shula | 0 | 0 | 55 | 115 | 312 | 612 |
| 🇺🇸 Baugh | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 330 | 695 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ShulaRetired | BaughRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Career coaching wins | 347 | — |
| Super Bowl titles | 2 | — |
| Perfect season (17-0) | 1 | — |
| AP NFL Coach of the Year awards | 4 | — |
| Seasons as a head coach | 33 | — |
| NFL titles | — | 2 |
| Passing titles | — | 6 |
| Punting average | — | 45 |
| Career interceptions on defence | — | 31 |
| Seasons played | — | 16 |
| Dominance w25% | 93 | 92 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 96 |
| Longevity w20% | 96 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 93 | 92 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 94 |
Don Shula leads with a GOAT score of 93.9 against 92.3 for Sammy Baugh — a gap of 1.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Baugh scores higher on peak. Shula leads on dominance, honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Shula: 93.9, Baugh: 92.3.
Make your case for Shula vs Baugh. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.