Who is better, Curry or Buchanan?
Donald Curry leads with a GOAT score of 83.9 against 83.9 for Ken Buchanan — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Curry vs Buchanan
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Donald Curry and Ken Buchanan level at 83.9. Donald Curry leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Ken Buchanan leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
CurryWinner
83.9Curry wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Buchanan
83.9Buchanan wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to BoxingShareable URL · /compare/donald-curry-vs-ken-buchanan
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Donald Curry
83.9
Curry leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Donald Curry
2. Ken Buchanan
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Donald Curry5 years played · career day 1,826329 title wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🏴 Ken Buchanan5 years played · career day 1,825293 title wins
-10.9% vs Curry at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Curry | 0 | 0 | 45 | 100 | 242 | 679 |
| 🏴 Buchanan | 0 | 0 | 40 | 89 | 293 | 649 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Curry83.9
Buchanan83.9
FAQ
Where does Buchanan beat Curry?
Buchanan scores higher on longevity. Curry leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
How is the Curry vs Buchanan score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Curry: 83.9, Buchanan: 83.9.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Curry vs Buchanan. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.