Who is better, Bailey or Astapkovich?
Donovan Bailey leads with a GOAT score of 87.4 against 87.3 for Igor Astapkovich — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Donovan Bailey above Igor Astapkovich: 87.4 vs 87.3. Donovan Bailey leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Igor Astapkovich leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Bailey wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Astapkovich wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/donovan-bailey-vs-igor-astapkovich
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Bailey leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Bailey | 0 | 0 | 40 | 92 | 318 | 631 |
| 🇧🇾 Astapkovich | 0 | 0 | 45 | 100 | 327 | 679 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BaileyRetired | AstapkovichRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 2 | — |
| World Championship titles | 2 | 1 |
| 100 metres world record | 984 | — |
| World relay titles | 1 | — |
| World Championship medals | 3 | 4 |
| Olympic medals | — | 2 |
| Personal best in centimetres | — | 8,462 |
| European Championship titles | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 90 |
Donovan Bailey leads with a GOAT score of 87.4 against 87.3 for Igor Astapkovich — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Astapkovich scores higher on longevity. Bailey leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bailey: 87.4, Astapkovich: 87.3.
Make your case for Bailey vs Astapkovich. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.