Who is better, Bailey or Edwards?
Donovan Bailey leads with a GOAT score of 87.4 against 87.4 for Jonathan Edwards — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Donovan Bailey and Jonathan Edwards level at 87.4. Donovan Bailey leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Jonathan Edwards leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Bailey wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Edwards wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/donovan-bailey-vs-jonathan-edwards
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Bailey leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Bailey | 0 | 0 | 40 | 92 | 318 | 631 |
| 🇬🇧 Edwards | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 71.14 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BaileyRetired | EdwardsRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 2 | — |
| World Championship titles | 2 | — |
| 100 metres world record | 984 | — |
| World relay titles | 1 | — |
| World Championship medals | 3 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 1 |
| World Championship golds | — | 2 |
| Triple jump world record (m) | — | 18.29 |
| European golds | — | 1 |
| Commonwealth golds | — | 1 |
| Jumps over 18 m | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 90 |
Donovan Bailey leads with a GOAT score of 87.4 against 87.4 for Jonathan Edwards — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Edwards scores higher on longevity. Bailey leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bailey: 87.4, Edwards: 87.4.
Make your case for Bailey vs Edwards. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.