Who is better, Fitschen or Boniperti?
Doris Fitschen leads with a GOAT score of 85.7 against 85.6 for Giampiero Boniperti — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Doris Fitschen above Giampiero Boniperti: 85.7 vs 85.6. Doris Fitschen leads on Honours, Peak. Giampiero Boniperti leads on Statistics, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Fitschen wins: Peak, Honours
Boniperti wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/doris-fitschen-v-vs-giampiero-boniperti
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Fitschen leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇪 Fitschen | 0 | 0 | 50 | 104 | 293 | 605 |
| 🇮🇹 Boniperti | 0 | 0 | 8 | 35 | 94 | 149 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | FitschenRetired | BonipertiRetired |
|---|---|---|
| European Championship titles | 4 | — |
| Germany caps | 144 | — |
| Olympic medals | 1 | — |
| Bundesliga titles | 2 | — |
| World Cup appearances | 3 | — |
| Serie A titles | — | 5 |
| Juventus goals | — | 178 |
| Serie A top scorer awards | — | 1 |
| Italy caps | — | 38 |
| Juventus appearances | — | 469 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 89 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 90 |
Doris Fitschen leads with a GOAT score of 85.7 against 85.6 for Giampiero Boniperti — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Boniperti scores higher on statistics, longevity. Fitschen leads on peak, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Fitschen: 85.7, Boniperti: 85.6.
Make your case for Fitschen vs Boniperti. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.