GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Hart vs Shriver

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
HartWinner
88.4

Hart wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics

Shriver
87.4

Shriver wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/doris-hart-vs-pam-shriver

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Doris Hart
88.4

Hart leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Won all 12 Grand Slam events: singles, doubles and mixed at every major.

1. Doris Hart
88.4
2. Pam Shriver
87.4

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇺🇸 Pam Shriver5 seasons played · career day 1,82535 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Doris Hart5 seasons played · career day 3,28620 titles
-42.9% vs Shriver at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Hart0000220
🇺🇸 Shriver00383581

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricHartRetiredShriverRetired
Grand Slam singles titles6
Grand Slam doubles titles1421
Grand Slam mixed titles15
Career Grand Slam completions3
Wightman Cup appearances8
Olympic golds1
Calendar Grand Slam in doubles1
WTA doubles titles112
Singles Grand Slam finals1
Dominance w25%8882
Peak w20%9290
Longevity w20%8088
Honours w20%9492
Statistics w15%8886

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Hart88.4
Shriver87.4
The people
Hart
Shriver

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Hart vs Shriver. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →