Who is better, Atkins or Largent?
Steve Largent leads with a GOAT score of 89.1 against 89.0 for Doug Atkins — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Atkins vs Largent
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Steve Largent above Doug Atkins: 89.1 vs 89.0. Steve Largent leads on Statistics. Doug Atkins leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
LargentWinner
89.1Largent wins: Statistics
Atkins
89.0Atkins wins: Longevity, Honours
Candidates
Locked to American FootballShareable URL · /compare/doug-atkins-vs-steve-largent
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Steve Largent
89.1
Largent leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Steve Largent
2. Doug Atkins
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Doug Atkins5 seasons played · career day 1,825300 touchdowns
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Steve Largent5 seasons played · career day 1,826289 touchdowns
-3.7% vs Atkins at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Atkins | 0 | 0 | 50 | 105 | 300 | 634 |
| 🇺🇸 Largent | 0 | 0 | 45 | 96 | 218 | 635 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Largent89.1
Atkins89.0
FAQ
Where does Atkins beat Largent?
Atkins scores higher on honours, longevity. Largent leads on statistics.
How is the Atkins vs Largent score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Atkins: 89.0, Largent: 89.1.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Atkins vs Largent. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.