Who is better, Gilmour or Brimsek?
Doug Gilmour leads with a GOAT score of 87.3 against 87.3 for Frank Brimsek — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Doug Gilmour and Frank Brimsek level at 87.3. Doug Gilmour leads on Longevity, Statistics. Frank Brimsek leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Gilmour wins: Longevity, Statistics
Brimsek wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/doug-gilmour-vs-frank-brimsek
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Gilmour leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Gilmour | 0 | 0 | 55 | 114 | 319 | 655 |
| 🇺🇸 Brimsek | 0 | 0 | 60 | 138 | 412 | 713 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Doug Gilmour leads with a GOAT score of 87.3 against 87.3 for Frank Brimsek — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Brimsek scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Gilmour leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Gilmour: 87.3, Brimsek: 87.3.
Make your case for Gilmour vs Brimsek. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.