Who is better, Harvey or LaCombe?
Doug Harvey leads with a GOAT score of 93.0 against 14.5 for Jackson LaCombe — a gap of 78.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Doug Harvey above Jackson LaCombe: 93.0 vs 14.5. Doug Harvey leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Harvey wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
LaCombe wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/doug-harvey-vs-ros-jackson-lacombe
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Harvey leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
LaCombe — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Harvey | 0 | 0 | 50 | 105 | 303 | 642 |
| 🏳️ LaCombe | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 118 | 118 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | HarveyRetired | LaCombeActive · Anaheim Ducks |
|---|---|---|
| Norris Trophies | 7 | — |
| Stanley Cups | 6 | — |
| First-team All-Star selections | 10 | — |
| Games played | 1,113 | — |
| Career assists | 452 | — |
| NHL games | — | 230 |
| NHL goals | — | 26 |
| NHL assists | — | 92 |
| NHL points | — | 118 |
| Number | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 94 | 14.2 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 19.6 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 12.2 |
| Honours w20% | 96 | 10.2 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 16.8 |
Doug Harvey leads with a GOAT score of 93.0 against 14.5 for Jackson LaCombe — a gap of 78.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
LaCombe does not lead any of the five categories; Harvey is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Harvey: 93.0, LaCombe: 14.5.
Make your case for Harvey vs LaCombe. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.