Who is better, Harvey or Terry?
Doug Harvey leads with a GOAT score of 93.0 against 14.1 for Troy Terry — a gap of 78.9 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Doug Harvey above Troy Terry: 93.0 vs 14.1. Doug Harvey leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Harvey wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Terry wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/doug-harvey-vs-ros-troy-terry
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Harvey leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Terry — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Harvey | 0 | 0 | 50 | 105 | 303 | 642 |
| 🏳️ Terry | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 115 | 342 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | HarveyRetired | TerryActive · Anaheim Ducks |
|---|---|---|
| Norris Trophies | 7 | — |
| Stanley Cups | 6 | — |
| First-team All-Star selections | 10 | — |
| Games played | 1,113 | — |
| Career assists | 452 | — |
| NHL games | — | 488 |
| NHL goals | — | 135 |
| NHL assists | — | 207 |
| NHL points | — | 342 |
| Number | — | 19 |
| Dominance w25% | 94 | 13.8 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 19.2 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 11.8 |
| Honours w20% | 96 | 9.8 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 16.5 |
Doug Harvey leads with a GOAT score of 93.0 against 14.1 for Troy Terry — a gap of 78.9 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Terry does not lead any of the five categories; Harvey is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Harvey: 93.0, Terry: 14.1.
Make your case for Harvey vs Terry. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.