Who is better, Carr or Duleepsinhji?
Duleepsinhji leads with a GOAT score of 79.1 against 78.7 for Douglas Carr — a gap of 0.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Duleepsinhji above Douglas Carr: 79.1 vs 78.7. Duleepsinhji leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Douglas Carr leads on Honours, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Duleepsinhji wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Carr wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/douglas-carr-vs-duleepsinhji
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Duleepsinhji leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Carr | 0 | 0 | 55 | 147 | 361 | 411 |
| 🇮🇳 Duleepsinhji | 0 | 0 | 420 | 1,400 | 5,100 | 14,407 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | CarrRetired | DuleepsinhjiRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Test appearances | 1 | — |
| Test wickets | 7 | — |
| First-class wickets | 334 | — |
| Wisden Cricketer of the Year | 1 | — |
| First-class matches | 77 | — |
| Test batting average | — | 58.52 |
| Test runs | — | 995 |
| First-class runs | — | 15,485 |
| First-class centuries | — | 50 |
| Tests played | — | 12 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 66 | 62 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 90 |
Duleepsinhji leads with a GOAT score of 79.1 against 78.7 for Douglas Carr — a gap of 0.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Carr scores higher on honours, longevity. Duleepsinhji leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Carr: 78.7, Duleepsinhji: 79.1.
Make your case for Carr vs Duleepsinhji. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.