Who is better, Green or McGinnis?
Draymond Green leads with a GOAT score of 83.0 against 83.0 for George McGinnis — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Draymond Green and George McGinnis level at 83.0. Draymond Green leads on Longevity, Honours. George McGinnis leads on Dominance, Statistics, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Green wins: Longevity, Honours
McGinnis wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/draymond-green-vs-george-mcginnis
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Green leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Green | 0 | 0 | 2.9 | 9.1 | 34.8 | 78.4 |
| 🇺🇸 McGinnis | 0 | 0 | 16.9 | 44.5 | 123.2 | 204.4 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | GreenActive · Golden State Warriors | McGinnisRetired |
|---|---|---|
| NBA titles | 4 | — |
| Defensive Player of the Year awards | 1 | — |
| All-Star selections | 4 | 6 |
| Olympic golds | 2 | — |
| Triple-doubles | 35 | — |
| ABA championships | — | 2 |
| ABA MVP awards | — | 1 |
| Career points per game | — | 20.2 |
| Career rebounds per game | — | 11 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 86 |
Draymond Green leads with a GOAT score of 83.0 against 83.0 for George McGinnis — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
McGinnis scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Green leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Green: 83.0, McGinnis: 83.0.
Make your case for Green vs McGinnis. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.