Who is better, Kahanamoku or Perkins?
Duke Kahanamoku leads with a GOAT score of 86.8 against 86.7 for Kieren Perkins — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Duke Kahanamoku above Kieren Perkins: 86.8 vs 86.7. Duke Kahanamoku leads on Longevity. Kieren Perkins leads on Honours, Statistics, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Kahanamoku wins: Longevity
Perkins wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/duke-kahanamoku-vs-kieren-perkins
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Kahanamoku leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Kahanamoku | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 🇦🇺 Perkins | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14.58 | 57.92 | 116.63 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KahanamokuRetired | PerkinsRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 3 | — |
| Olympic silver medals | 2 | — |
| Olympic Games contested | 4 | — |
| World records | 6 | 4 |
| Years at world level | 20 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 2 |
| World Championship golds | — | 2 |
| 1500m best (min) | — | 14.41 |
| Commonwealth golds | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 90 |
Duke Kahanamoku leads with a GOAT score of 86.8 against 86.7 for Kieren Perkins — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Perkins scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. Kahanamoku leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Kahanamoku: 86.8, Perkins: 86.7.
Make your case for Kahanamoku vs Perkins. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.