Who is better, Keats or Hern?
Duke Keats leads with a GOAT score of 84.9 against 84.8 for Riley Hern — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Keats vs Hern
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Duke Keats above Riley Hern: 84.9 vs 84.8. Duke Keats leads on Statistics, Longevity, Peak. Riley Hern leads on Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
KeatsWinner
84.9Keats wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Hern
84.8Hern wins: Honours
Candidates
Locked to Ice HockeyShareable URL · /compare/duke-keats-vs-riley-hern
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇦 Duke Keats
84.9
Keats leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Duke Keats
2. Riley Hern
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇨🇦 Riley Hern5 seasons played · career day 1,825340 points
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇦 Duke Keats5 seasons played · career day 1,825326 points
-4.1% vs Hern at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Keats | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 326 | 678 |
| 🇨🇦 Hern | 0 | 0 | 50 | 109 | 340 | 654 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Keats84.9
Hern84.8
FAQ
Where does Hern beat Keats?
Hern scores higher on honours. Keats leads on peak, statistics, longevity.
How is the Keats vs Hern score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Keats: 84.9, Hern: 84.8.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Keats vs Hern. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.