Who is better, Keats or Horton?
Duke Keats leads with a GOAT score of 84.9 against 84.9 for Tim Horton — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Keats vs Horton
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Duke Keats and Tim Horton level at 84.9. Duke Keats leads on Dominance, Statistics, Peak. Tim Horton leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
KeatsWinner
84.9Keats wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Horton
84.9Horton wins: Longevity, Honours
Candidates
Locked to Ice HockeyShareable URL · /compare/duke-keats-vs-tim-horton
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇦 Duke Keats
84.9
Keats leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Duke Keats
2. Tim Horton
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇨🇦 Duke Keats5 seasons played · career day 1,825326 points
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇦 Tim Horton5 seasons played · career day 1,825263 points
-19.3% vs Keats at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Keats | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 326 | 678 |
| 🇨🇦 Horton | 0 | 0 | 45 | 94 | 263 | 541 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Keats84.9
Horton84.9
FAQ
Where does Horton beat Keats?
Horton scores higher on honours, longevity. Keats leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
How is the Keats vs Horton score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Keats: 84.9, Horton: 84.9.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Keats vs Horton. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.