Who is better, dumau or Uzi?
Felipe "dumau" Moreira leads with a GOAT score of 76.7 against 76.5 for Jian "Uzi" Zi-Hao — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Felipe "dumau" Moreira above Jian "Uzi" Zi-Hao: 76.7 vs 76.5. Felipe "dumau" Moreira leads on Statistics, Longevity. Jian "Uzi" Zi-Hao leads on Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →dumau wins: Longevity, Statistics
Uzi wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/dumau-vs-uzi
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
dumau leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇧🇷 dumau | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.08 | 4.41 | 6.6 |
| 🇨🇳 Uzi | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 19 | 46 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | dumauActive | UziRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Big event playoff appearances | 4 | — |
| Major appearances | 2 | — |
| Career rating | 1.1 | — |
| Professional seasons | 7 | — |
| Regional titles | 5 | — |
| Worlds finals | — | 2 |
| LPL titles | — | 2 |
| MSI titles | — | 1 |
| Asian Games golds | — | 1 |
| LPL MVP awards | — | 2 |
| Career prize money (USD) | — | 700,000 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 72 |
| Honours w20% | 66 | 72 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 80 |
Felipe "dumau" Moreira leads with a GOAT score of 76.7 against 76.5 for Jian "Uzi" Zi-Hao — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Uzi scores higher on dominance, honours. dumau leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. dumau: 76.7, Uzi: 76.5.
Make your case for dumau vs Uzi. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.