Who is better, Keith or Abel?
Duncan Keith leads with a GOAT score of 85.4 against 85.4 for Sid Abel — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Keith vs Abel
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Duncan Keith and Sid Abel level at 85.4. Duncan Keith leads on Longevity. Sid Abel leads on Dominance, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
KeithWinner
85.4Keith wins: Longevity
Abel
85.4Abel wins: Dominance, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to Ice HockeyShareable URL · /compare/duncan-keith-vs-sid-abel
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇦 Duncan Keith
85.4
Keith leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Duncan Keith
2. Sid Abel
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇨🇦 Duncan Keith5 seasons played · career day 2,921197 points
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇦 Sid Abel5 seasons played · career day 1,825113 points
-42.6% vs Keith at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Keith | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 52 | 242 |
| 🇨🇦 Abel | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 113 | 268 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Keith85.4
Abel85.4
FAQ
Where does Abel beat Keith?
Abel scores higher on dominance, statistics. Keith leads on longevity.
How is the Keith vs Abel score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Keith: 85.4, Abel: 85.4.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Keith vs Abel. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.