Who is better, Scott or Hagino?
Duncan Scott leads with a GOAT score of 82.3 against 82.3 for Kosuke Hagino — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Scott vs Hagino
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Duncan Scott and Kosuke Hagino level at 82.3. Duncan Scott leads on Longevity. Kosuke Hagino leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ScottWinner
82.3Scott wins: Longevity
Hagino
82.3Hagino wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to SwimmingShareable URL · /compare/duncan-scott-vs-kosuke-hagino
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Duncan Scott
82.3
Scott leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Duncan Scott
2. Kosuke Hagino
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇬🇧 Duncan Scott5 seasons played · career day 1,826404 major golds
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇯🇵 Kosuke Hagino5 seasons played · career day 1,82615 major golds
-96.3% vs Scott at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Scott | 0 | 0 | 70 | 146 | 318 | 770 |
| 🇯🇵 Hagino | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 19 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Scott82.3
Hagino82.3
FAQ
Where does Hagino beat Scott?
Hagino scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Scott leads on longevity.
How is the Scott vs Hagino score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Scott: 82.3, Hagino: 82.3.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Scott vs Hagino. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.