Who is better, Scott or Ceccon?
Duncan Scott leads with a GOAT score of 82.3 against 82.2 for Thomas Ceccon — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Duncan Scott above Thomas Ceccon: 82.3 vs 82.2. Duncan Scott leads on Longevity. Thomas Ceccon leads on Peak, Statistics, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Scott wins: Longevity
Ceccon wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/duncan-scott-vs-thomas-ceccon
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Scott leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Scott | 0 | 0 | 70 | 146 | 318 | 770 |
| 🇮🇹 Ceccon | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 31 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Duncan Scott leads with a GOAT score of 82.3 against 82.2 for Thomas Ceccon — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Ceccon scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. Scott leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Scott: 82.3, Ceccon: 82.2.
Make your case for Scott vs Ceccon. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.