Who is better, Duplantis or Blake?
Armand Duplantis leads with a GOAT score of 86.3 against 86.2 for Yohan Blake — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Armand Duplantis above Yohan Blake: 86.3 vs 86.2. Armand Duplantis leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Yohan Blake leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Duplantis wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Blake wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/duplantis-vs-yohan-blake
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Duplantis leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Blake — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | DuplantisActive | BlakeActive |
|---|---|---|
| World records | 13 | — |
| Olympic golds | 2 | — |
| World golds (outdoor) | 3 | — |
| World golds (indoor) | 2 | — |
| European golds | 3 | — |
| Diamond League titles | 6 | — |
| Best height (m) | 6.3 | — |
| 6.00m+ clearances | 100 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 2 |
| World Championship golds | — | 4 |
| 100 m personal best | — | 9.69 |
| 200 m personal best | — | 19.26 |
| Olympic silver medals | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 94 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 97 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 62 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 88 |
Armand Duplantis leads with a GOAT score of 86.3 against 86.2 for Yohan Blake — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Blake scores higher on longevity. Duplantis leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Duplantis: 86.3, Blake: 86.2.
Make your case for Duplantis vs Blake. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.