Who is better, dupreeh or Staehr?
Jens "Staehr" Staehr leads with a GOAT score of 78.1 against 77.8 for Peter "dupreeh" Rasmussen — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jens "Staehr" Staehr above Peter "dupreeh" Rasmussen: 78.1 vs 77.8. Jens "Staehr" Staehr leads on Statistics, Peak, Dominance. Peter "dupreeh" Rasmussen leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Staehr wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
dupreeh wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/dupreeh-vs-es-staehr
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Staehr leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇰 dupreeh | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.13 | 7.57 |
| 🇩🇰 Staehr | 0 | 0 | 50 | 110 | 350 | 680 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | dupreehActive | StaehrActive |
|---|---|---|
| Major titles | 4 | — |
| Premier tournament wins | 30 | — |
| Top-20 appearances | 6 | — |
| Intel Grand Slams | 1 | — |
| Major finals | 6 | — |
| Career prize money (USD) | 1,800,000 | — |
| Big tournament titles | — | 3 |
| Major appearances | — | 4 |
| Seasons played | — | 8 |
| Career maps played | — | 1,200 |
| Tournament finals | — | 5 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 80 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 72 |
| Statistics w15% | 76 | 88 |
Jens "Staehr" Staehr leads with a GOAT score of 78.1 against 77.8 for Peter "dupreeh" Rasmussen — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
dupreeh scores higher on honours, longevity. Staehr leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. dupreeh: 77.8, Staehr: 78.1.
Make your case for dupreeh vs Staehr. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.