Who is better, Stephenson or Willis?
Dwight Stephenson leads with a GOAT score of 82.3 against 82.2 for Patrick Willis — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Dwight Stephenson above Patrick Willis: 82.3 vs 82.2. Dwight Stephenson leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Patrick Willis leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Stephenson wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Willis wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/dwight-stephenson-vs-patrick-willis
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Stephenson leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Stephenson | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 28 |
| 🇺🇸 Willis | 0 | 0 | 174 | 315 | 692 | 911 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | StephensonRetired | WillisRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Pro Bowls | 5 | — |
| First-team All-Pro selections | 4 | 5 |
| Games played | 114 | — |
| Seasons played | 8 | — |
| All-Decade team selections | 1 | — |
| Pro Bowl selections | — | 7 |
| Career tackles | — | 950 |
| Defensive Rookie of the Year awards | — | 1 |
| Super Bowl appearances | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 62 | 68 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 86 |
Dwight Stephenson leads with a GOAT score of 82.3 against 82.2 for Patrick Willis — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Willis scores higher on honours, longevity. Stephenson leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Stephenson: 82.3, Willis: 82.2.
Make your case for Stephenson vs Willis. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.