GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Campbell vs Jones

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
CampbellWinner
86.3

Campbell wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics

Jones
86.3

Jones wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to American Football

Shareable URL · /compare/earl-campbell-vs-too-tall-jones

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Earl Campbell
86.3

Campbell leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Three straight rushing titles and the 1979 NFL MVP award.

1. Earl Campbell
86.3
2. Ed "Too Tall" Jones
86.3

Category breakdown

Season form · Touchdowns per season

Career timeline · Touchdowns per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Touchdowns per season
1. 🇺🇸 Earl Campbell5 seasons played · career day 1,825382 touchdowns
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Ed "Too Tall" Jones5 seasons played · career day 1,82537 touchdowns
-90.3% vs Campbell at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Campbell0060159382494
🇺🇸 Jones004103762

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricCampbellRetiredJonesRetired
Rushing titles3
NFL MVP awards1
Rushing yards9,407
Offensive Rookie of the Year awards1
Pro Bowls53
Super Bowl titles1
Games played224
Career sacks106
Seasons played15
Dominance w25%9080
Peak w20%9690
Longevity w20%6692
Honours w20%8882
Statistics w15%9290

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Campbell86.3
Jones86.3
The people
Campbell
Jones

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Campbell vs Jones. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →