GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Shavers vs Jonas

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ShaversWinner
80.6

Shavers wins: Longevity, Statistics

Jonas
80.4

Jonas wins: Honours

Candidates
Locked to Boxing

Shareable URL · /compare/earnie-shavers-vs-natasha-jonas

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Earnie Shavers
80.6

Shavers leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Regarded as the hardest puncher in heavyweight history with 68 knockouts.

1. Earnie Shavers
80.6
2. Natasha Jonas
80.4

Category breakdown

Season form · Form index per season

Career timeline · Form index per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Form index per season
1. 🇺🇸 Earnie Shavers5 years played · career day 1,82545 title wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Natasha Jonas5 years played · career day 1,82513 title wins
-71.1% vs Shavers at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Shavers0011214563
🇬🇧 Jonas00361317

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricShaversRetiredJonasActive
Career knockouts68
Professional wins7415
World title fights2
Professional bouts89
Career span in years26
World titles won4
Olympic appearances1
Knockout wins9
Weight classes with world titles2
Dominance w25%7676
Peak w20%9090
Longevity w20%8472
Honours w20%6882
Statistics w15%8884

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Shavers80.6
Jonas80.4
The people
Shavers
Jonas

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Shavers vs Jonas. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →