GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Goodfellow vs Housley

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
GoodfellowWinner
87.7

Goodfellow wins: Dominance, Honours

Housley
87.7

Housley wins: Longevity, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Ice Hockey

Shareable URL · /compare/ebbie-goodfellow-vs-phil-housley

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇦 Ebbie Goodfellow
87.7

Goodfellow leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Hart Trophy winner in 1940 and a three-time Stanley Cup champion.

1. Ebbie Goodfellow
87.7
2. Phil Housley
87.7

Category breakdown

Season form · Points per season

Career timeline · Points per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Points per season
1. 🇨🇦 Ebbie Goodfellow5 seasons played · career day 1,825300 points
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Phil Housley5 seasons played · career day 1,825296 points
-1.3% vs Goodfellow at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇨🇦 Goodfellow0050105300630
🇺🇸 Housley0050105296614

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricGoodfellowRetiredHousleyRetired
Stanley Cups3
Hart Trophies1
Career points3241,232
All-star selections3
Seasons played1421
Career assists894
Games played1,495
All-Star selections7
Dominance w25%8482
Peak w20%9090
Longevity w20%8694
Honours w20%9080
Statistics w15%9096

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Goodfellow87.7
Housley87.7
The people
Goodfellow
Housley

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Goodfellow vs Housley. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →