GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Belfour vs Labonté

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
BelfourWinner
89.6

Belfour wins: Peak, Statistics

Labonté
89.6

Labonté wins: Dominance, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Ice Hockey

Shareable URL · /compare/ed-belfour-vs-charline-labonte

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇦 Ed Belfour
89.6

Belfour leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Stanley Cup champion in 1999 with 484 career wins and two Vezinas.

1. Ed Belfour
89.6
2. Charline Labonté
89.6

Category breakdown

Season form · Points per season

Career timeline · Points per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Points per season
1. 🇨🇦 Ed Belfour5 seasons played · career day 1,826387 points
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇦 Charline Labonté5 seasons played · career day 2,92145 points
-88.4% vs Belfour at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇨🇦 Belfour0050116294725
🇨🇦 Labonté00001456

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricBelfourRetiredLabontéRetired
Career wins484
Stanley Cups1
Vezina Trophies2
Career shutouts76
Olympic gold medals1
Olympic golds4
World Championship golds2
Olympic appearances4
CWHL Clarkson Cups3
Canada caps82
Dominance w25%8688
Peak w20%9492
Longevity w20%8888
Honours w20%8892
Statistics w15%9488

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Belfour89.6
Labonté89.6
The people
Belfour
Labonté

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Belfour vs Labonté. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →