Who is better, Healey or Atwater?
Ed Healey leads with a GOAT score of 83.2 against 83.2 for Steve Atwater — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Healey vs Atwater
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Ed Healey and Steve Atwater level at 83.2. Ed Healey leads on Dominance. Steve Atwater leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
HealeyWinner
83.2Healey wins: Dominance
Atwater
83.2Atwater wins: Longevity, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to American FootballShareable URL · /compare/ed-healey-vs-steve-atwater
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Ed Healey
83.2
Healey leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Ed Healey
2. Steve Atwater
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Ed Healey5 seasons played · career day 1,826363 touchdowns
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Steve Atwater5 seasons played · career day 1,82515 touchdowns
-95.9% vs Healey at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Healey | 0 | 0 | 50 | 111 | 268 | 538 |
| 🇺🇸 Atwater | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 15 | 21 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Healey83.2
Atwater83.2
FAQ
Where does Atwater beat Healey?
Atwater scores higher on statistics, longevity. Healey leads on dominance.
How is the Healey vs Atwater score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Healey: 83.2, Atwater: 83.2.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Healey vs Atwater. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.